Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:45:07 -0400
From:      Brandon Allbery <allbery.b@gmail.com>
To:        Claude Buisson <clbuisson@orange.fr>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots
Message-ID:  <CAKFCL4VBVLsbsikFu91AVk-UFaO6mCoPAhO8b9yzQ8PE61nXcA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50761108.9070005@orange.fr>
References:  <50717D35.7040106@affle.com> <1349727367645-5750424.post@n5.nabble.com> <50754E24.4040903@orange.fr> <1349873186577-5750838.post@n5.nabble.com> <5075AA96.6050101@orange.fr> <CAN6yY1v0CHXz-FE=1OZmTvY4T5SmSX5zLvrzL1PzWGMeLSmTHg@mail.gmail.com> <50761108.9070005@orange.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Claude Buisson <clbuisson@orange.fr> wrote:

> I can easily understand that developpers are happy to switch to new tools,
> but
> the question is: do FreeBSD developpers care a bit about non developpers,
> and
>

FreeBSD developers are required to keep their development systems and tools
with the needs of non-developers as the primary requirement?

-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b@gmail.com                                  ballbery@sinenomine.net
unix/linux, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure          http://sinenomine.net



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKFCL4VBVLsbsikFu91AVk-UFaO6mCoPAhO8b9yzQ8PE61nXcA>