From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 4 23:09:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476E61065672 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 23:09:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yurtesen@ispro.net) Received: from mail.ispro.net (mail.ispro.net [87.251.0.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206838FC18 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 23:09:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yurtesen@ispro.net) Received: (qmail 27697 invoked by uid 399); 5 Jun 2008 02:05:42 +0300 Received: from dsl-tkubrasgw1-fed0de00-174.dhcp.inet.fi (HELO ?80.222.208.174?) (yurtesen@ispro.net@80.222.208.174) by mail.ispro.net with ESMTPAM; 5 Jun 2008 02:05:42 +0300 X-Originating-IP: 80.222.208.174 Message-ID: <484720AF.8000405@ispro.net> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 02:09:35 +0300 From: Evren Yurtesen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Smith References: <4847072E.5000709@ispro.net> <48470ED0.600@modulus.org> <484713B2.5030200@ispro.net> <48471834.30905@modulus.org> <20080604225312.GA2625@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20080604225312.GA2625@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Andrew Snow Subject: Re: cpufreq broken on core2duo X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:09:06 -0000 Roland Smith wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 08:33:24AM +1000, Andrew Snow wrote: >> Here's another one: >> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5410 @ 2.33GHz >> cpu0: on acpi0 >> est0: on cpu0 >> est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. >> est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 720072006000720 >> device_attach: est0 attach returned 6 >> p4tcc0: on cpu0 > > I had this on a new core2 quad. Updating to a recent 7-STABLE fixed the > issue for me. Did any of you tried chkfreq which comes with acpi_ppc http://www.spa.is.uec.ac.jp/~nfukuda/software/ to check if the cpu frequency is actually changing? Thanks, Evren