From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 29 22:19:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4C216B68D for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 22:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B02A43D6D for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 22:19:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.14] (imini.samsco.home [192.168.254.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4TMJRjK072491; Mon, 29 May 2006 16:19:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <447B735A.30303@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 16:19:06 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Sobolev References: <447AB34C.4030509@sippysoft.com> <447B5A43.4000707@samsco.org> <447B69EA.20502@sippysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <447B69EA.20502@sippysoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Importing iSCSI target from NetBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 22:19:52 -0000 AH, I did not know that. But that raises another question. FreeBSD already has a SCSI target framework, so how does this NetBSD code fit into that? Or are you suggesting that consistency isn't important? Scott Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Scott, > > It seems that you aren't aware that Intel/NetBSD implementation is > completely userland one and it uses any block device/file as backing > store (no interaction with CAM). Therefore, it won't interfere with > whatever work you and others do in the CAM area. > > -Maxim > > Scott Long wrote: > >> Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I wonder if anybody has any objections to importing iSCSI target >>> daemon from NetBSD (Intel) into the base. >>> >>> -Maxim >> >> >> Yes. I'm nearing completion of locking CAM, and adding new subsystems >> is not going >> to help that effort at the moment. I'd also like you to talk with >> Matt Jacob and Nate Lawson >> about it since they have quite a bit of current experience with the >> SCSI target side of things. >> So in other words, a drive-by commit is not welcome and will be >> drive-by uncommitted unless >> you work with the people who can provide help and guidance. >> >> Scott >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >