From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jun 3 0:59:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from topaz.mdcc.cx (topaz.mdcc.cx [212.204.230.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8DDD37B400 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 00:59:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from k7.mavetju (topaz.mdcc.cx [212.204.230.141]) by topaz.mdcc.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2ABF2B8BC; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 09:59:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 45D136A711E; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 17:58:04 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 17:58:04 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Hopeless Case Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: papaya-0.90 Message-ID: <20020603175804.E553@k7.mavetju> References: <3CFB1DA9.7060908@bsdbox.sytes.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3CFB1DA9.7060908@bsdbox.sytes.net>; from senir@bsdbox.sytes.net on Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 12:41:29AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 12:41:29AM -0700, Hopeless Case wrote: > When is the scheduled upgrade to papaya-0.96 stable? 0.92 wasn't compilable at all do to weird symlinks in the tarball which they couldn't explain how to handle them. 0.94 was released May 17th. 0.96 was released May 26th. If you give me a couple of days and the code isn't too bad *crosses fingers* I have a new port. If it is as hopeless as 0.92 was, it will be a tough cookie. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org edwin@mavetju.org | Interested in MUDs? Visit Fatal Dimensions: bash$ :(){ :|:&};: | http://www.FatalDimensions.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message