Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 18:13:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: Alexander Kabaev <ak03@gte.com> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: _pthread_cond_wait vs. __pthread_condwait Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10305191812350.22159-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20030519174833.28db3cd2.ak03@gte.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 19 May 2003, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> The _pthread_cond_wait function has this at the beginning:
>
> _thr_enter_cancellation_point(curthread);
>
> if (cond == NULL) {
> _thr_leave_cancellation_point(curthread);
> and this at the end:
> _thr_leave_cancellation_point(curthread);
>
>
> __pthread_cond_wait is defined as
>
> _thr_enter_cancellation_point(curthread);
> ret = _pthread_cond_wait(cond, mutex);
> _thr_leave_cancellation_point(curthread);
> return (ret);
>
> So what is the difference between the two? Should't cancellantion checks
> ve removed from _pthread_cond_wait?
Yes, and the weak references are wrong too (they should be
to __pthread_cond_wait/__pthread_cond_timedwait).
--
Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10305191812350.22159-100000>