Date: 25 Sep 2000 13:40:20 -0700 From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: unbreak devel/cdk port, raise minor PORTREVISION issue Message-ID: <vqcg0moryrv.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Peter Pentchev's message of "Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:44:42 %2B0300" References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009250305480.31922-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> <vqclmwgslq0.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000925154442.D31322@ringwraith.office1.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg>
* Uhm.. For the other 51 ports, your fix probably did The Right Thing(tm);
* and thank you :)
*
* However, the devel/cdk port is still broken :) It has DISTNAME=cdk,
* yet the dist tarball unpacks into cdk-4.9.10/; that's why this particular
* port needs WRKSRC=${WRKDIR}/${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}.
I'm not sure what you are talking about. I did fix the cdk port and
it no longer defines DISTNAME as the result. Are you sure you are
looking at the right version? :>
By the way, I did verify that my "fix" works for most ports (including
cdk) before the commit..
:
* > The real reason of the devel/cdk breakage is the
* > WRKSRC=${WRKDIR}/${PKGNAME} line in its Makefile. Instead of defining
* > DISTNAME and WRKSRC, it should have just used DISTFILES. It will
* > reduce the line count too.
* >
* > I did a search and this was not the only port that defined WRKSRC as
* > ${WRKDIR}/${PKGNAME}. I committed fixes to all 52 of them just now.
:
Satoshi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcg0moryrv.fsf>