From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 20 05:17:37 2013
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id 51F00970; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:17:37 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:17:37 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r316102 - in head/emulators/dolphin-emu-devel: . files
Message-ID: <20130420051737.GA23612@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201304191335.r3JDZF4B031649@svn.freebsd.org>
 <20130419134935.GA29457@FreeBSD.org>
 <20130419150333.M65185@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAF6rxgme6zpAs9gB3oNcoNupFVSMRYTAoZxhbJPkNHD3gKEH1A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgme6zpAs9gB3oNcoNupFVSMRYTAoZxhbJPkNHD3gKEH1A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 Ganael LAPLANCHE <martymac@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:17:37 -0000

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:49:45PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 11:15, Ganael LAPLANCHE <martymac@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > To encourage people to test the port on other archs, maybe something like :
> >
> > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=         i386 amd64
> > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS_REASON=  Has only been tested on i386 and amd64
> >
> > would be more explicit ?
> 
> No.
> 
> ONLY_FOR_* means that the port is *never intended* to work on any
> other platform.  BROKEN ports are, in theory, periodically tested.

Exactly.  I only mentioned ONLY_FOR_ARCHS to illustrate that "i386-specific
option" is overly vague even to tell BROKEN from ONLY_FOR_ARCHS, which are
very different beasts, and should not be confused.

./danfe