Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 12:29:29 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 212323] tests/sys/acl/01:main fails due to changes in NFSv4 ACL behavior on ^/head Message-ID: <bug-212323-3630-tuVE1uki6P@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-212323-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-212323-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212323 --- Comment #7 from Harald Schmalzbauer <bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de> --- My ZFS setups suffer from an upstream ACL inheritance bug: https://www.illumos.org/issues/9722 wich is referring https://www.illumos.org/issues/8984 The latter is marked closed/solved but it is only partially solved, like the newer issue describes. I had to give up using samba for environments where NTFS ACLs are crucial. I also gave up deploying new NFSv4 ACL setups. All previous setups were damaged by the mentioned ZFS inheritance bugs. I remember many questions to be clarified regarding d and D flags (and in respect to NTFS conventions also R and W and C), but lost almost all experi= ence results. I can't tell anything about the test failure status! I just can tell that I'm observing issues regading ACL/permission mappings. Time for me to look into tests... I'm really interested in polishing our ACL implementation, but I'm lacking a good portion of standards knowledge (posix) and my lousy C skills require someone else to fix the ZFS inheritance bug first. Symlinks are one major issue to discuss regarding inheritance on ZFS =E2=80= =93 that was/is another big problem in my setups. I still have my private ACL setups (partially damaged), which is a collecti= on of special usage scenarios (e.g. users can add files and directories, but c= an't delete anything, even not their own; or shared home directory, which suffers from chmod(2) fallout due to the ACL). So it's my pleasure to test any changes and put some light in uncommon but usefuls corner cases ;-) And I'm willing to do my best to catch up with posix knowledge, but unfortunately I can't afford spending much time :-( My personal estimation was that some very skilled persons would need at lea= st a week to decide/implement and test a new/improved ACL mapping mode. My needs aren't covered by the current ACL/permission mappings =E2=80=93 no= t for NFSv4 only environments and additional CIFS/NTFS bridges were mutual destructive. Thanks, -harry --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-212323-3630-tuVE1uki6P>