From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 02:30:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B98716A492 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:30:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2304D43CA1 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:29:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.localdomain (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4006551977 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:30:51 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:30:47 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612100905.30430.kirk@strauser.com> <200612110100.26229.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612110230.47544.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Subject: Re: Advantages of trimmed kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:30:54 -0000 On Monday 11 December 2006 01:47, Juha Saarinen wrote: > On 12/11/06, RW wrote: > > As I understand it the argument in favour of smaller kernels isn't that > > they free-up memory for other uses, it's that they make better uses of > > memory cache. > > > > OTOH big blocks of code that are rarely entered probably aren't going to > > degrade performance much. > > Security through less code? Hmm, dunno. Who mentioned security?