Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:08:54 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely8.cicely.de> To: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au> Cc: "Wilkinson,Alex" <Alex.Wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au>, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [hardware] Tagged Command Queuing or Larger Cache ? Message-ID: <20021029100853.GI13186@cicely8.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20021029020943.GI6446@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> References: <20021029095516.G91719-100000@squirm.dsto.defence.gov.au> <20021029020943.GI6446@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 01:09:43PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2002-Oct-29 09:55:49 +1030, "Wilkinson,Alex" <Alex.Wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au> wrote: > >Do the benifits from a having a larger disk cache such as the "WD > >40GB 7200RPM w/8MB Cache" has, outweigh the benefits of Tagged > >Command Queuing ? > > This is somewhat off-topic for -alpha... To bring it back to alpha. I noticed that setting values in kernel.conf are ignored on -current alpha. I had to change the drivers default value to get tagged queueing. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021029100853.GI13186>