Date: Mon, 07 Oct 1996 14:11:54 -0700 From: David Greenman <dg@root.com> To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Cc: wollman@freefall.freebsd.org (Garrett Wollman), hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_input.c ip_output.c raw_ip.c Message-ID: <199610072111.OAA20837@root.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 07 Oct 1996 20:34:21 BST." <199610071934.UAA28629@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Since people is working on tcp/ip stuff, is there still a reason to >keep all the "TUBA" stuff in our sources ? In my opinion it should be removed. The only reason one might keep it would be as sort of "reference" for implementing large IP addresses (TUBA = "TCP/UDP with Big Addresses"), but the TUBA proposal is clearly not what the Internet is going to in the future. I think the code is dead weight and only serves to make the 'real' code more difficult to follow and maintain. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610072111.OAA20837>