From owner-freebsd-current Wed Aug 7 08:06:25 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA02909 for current-outgoing; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 08:06:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.177]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA02873; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 08:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA06736; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 14:05:25 +0200 (MET DST) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Peter Wemm , Nate Williams , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whither gcc 2.7? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 07 Aug 1996 04:36:01 PDT." <10357.839417761@time.cdrom.com> Date: Wed, 07 Aug 1996 14:05:25 +0200 Message-ID: <6734.839419525@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <10357.839417761@time.cdrom.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >> The more I think about it, the more I'm changing my mind and coming to the >> opinion that we can do a lot more with it if the parts that we need go >> into src/contrib with the bmake build points in the correct part of the >> tree as usual. > >And I believe that's even the politically correct method these days, >too! :-) One gripe somebody had with Poul's TCL import was that he >didn't also check in the script, be it ever so simple, that "created" >the importable sources. NetBSD does this, a good example being in >freefall:/c/NetBSD/NetBSD-current/src/gnu/usr.bin/gcc/gcc2netbsd, and >I figure we should too. Hey a "gripe" ? I saw it as a very good suggestion :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.