Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:34:36 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 207376] [unbreak] devel/roboctl  Restored distfile
Message-ID:  <bug-207376-13-H6ANfqvx8e@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-207376-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-207376-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D207376

--- Comment #4 from Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> ---
> BTW, I never received notification that the port was marked broken. Aren'=
t maintainers normally notified automatically when a package build fails?  =
I checked my spam and trash folders:nothing.

I _think_ you should get weekly nags from pkg-fallout when the cluster fail=
s to
build a port, though I don't see anything in the freebsd-pkg-fallout mailing
list archives indeed. It might have been the case that bapt was overzealous=
 in
port r403636 and marked it broken before it was caught by a cluster build
(since that commit marks several ports broken).

With that said, `make checksum' fails here with the new tarball uploaded to=
 the
master site:

=3D> Attempting to fetch http://acadix.biz/Ports/distfiles/roboctl-0.3.8.ta=
r.xz
fetch: http://acadix.biz/Ports/distfiles/roboctl-0.3.8.tar.xz: size mismatc=
h:
expected 270384, actual 270476
=3D> Attempting to fetch
http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/roboctl-0.3.8.tar.xz
roboctl-0.3.8.tar.xz                          100% of  264 kB  122 kBps 00m=
03s

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-207376-13-H6ANfqvx8e>