From owner-freebsd-net Thu May 14 14:32:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA16359 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 14 May 1998 14:32:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA16332 for ; Thu, 14 May 1998 14:31:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA21779; Thu, 14 May 1998 14:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd021774; Thu May 14 21:23:47 1998 Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 14:23:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Richard Wackerbarth cc: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh , Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= , net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: v6 issues In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 13 May 1998, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > I do not think that, at this point, either implementation is clearly > superior. Adoption of either would be better than avoiding both. Of course, > to the extent that the two implementations can agree on commonality of > implementation, we have a "no brainer" in adopting that common component. > We have a WIDE representative.. We should ask Francis if he wishes to discuss this with us as well. it may turn out that they can actually agree on a lot.... julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message