Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 14:23:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh <itojun@itojun.org>, Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <dag-erli@ifi.uio.no>, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: v6 issues Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980514141716.11729J-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <l03130300b17f3f6fbce5@[208.2.87.10]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 13 May 1998, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > I do not think that, at this point, either implementation is clearly > superior. Adoption of either would be better than avoiding both. Of course, > to the extent that the two implementations can agree on commonality of > implementation, we have a "no brainer" in adopting that common component. > We have a WIDE representative.. We should ask Francis if he wishes to discuss this with us as well. it may turn out that they can actually agree on a lot.... julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.980514141716.11729J-100000>