Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 19:25:07 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Chema_Garc=EDa?= <chema@safetybits.net> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DTrace issue (infinite loop) Message-ID: <4FF47C73.6070108@safetybits.net> In-Reply-To: <20120704190759.461015c1@fabiankeil.de> References: <4FF4307E.1030202@safetybits.net> <20120704190759.461015c1@fabiankeil.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigCA02DDD63BF0A74229E5959A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No it doesn't, I get the same result without -O3 and with -O2 Un saludo, */Chema Garc=EDa/* /SafetyBits <http://safetybits.net> | @sch3m4 <https://twitter.com/sch3m4= >/ On 04/07/12 19:07, Fabian Keil wrote: > Chema Garc=EDa <chema@safetybits.net> wrote: > >> I've been trying to compile Python 2.7 with dtrace support from >> https://hg.jcea.es/cpython-2011/ (branch dtrace-issue13405_2.7 ) to te= st >> http://bugs.python.org/issue13405#msg164610. >> >> I've also recompiled the kernel to enable dtrace support by following >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/dtrace-enable.html , but >> dtrace enters into an infinite loop when compiling, and using 100% of >> CPU usage. >> >> I'm using FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3, and used: >> >> ./configure --with-dtrace && make >> >> And the issue occurs at: >> >> gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall= >> -Wstrict-prototypes -I. -IInclude -I./Include -DPy_BUILD_CORE -o >> Include/pydtrace_offsets Include/pydtrace_offsets.c >> Include/pydtrace_offsets.sh OTHER Python/ceval.o >> Include/pydtrace_offsets > Include/pydtrace_offsets.h >> if test "dtrace" !=3D "" ; then dtrace -o Python/pydtrace.o >> -DPYDTRACE_STACK_HELPER -I. -IInclude -I./Include -32 -C -G -s >> Include/pydtrace.d Python/ceval.o Modules/gcmodule.o=20 >> Objects/classobject.o Objects/typeobject.o; else touch >> Python/pydtrace.o ; fi; >> >> I've tried removing '-DPYDTRACE_STACK_HELPER' with same results. > Does it make a difference if you remove the -O3 (and maybe -O2)? > > Fabian --------------enigCA02DDD63BF0A74229E5959A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP9HxzAAoJEIhVozRoGD+GCtkP/2Bqd9ESRi7fZ3CtmEdUlc68 Kmz/to3tTDd4aBZLMcHBIZ3rHhvYViEXvv4FR9GmhJWTHTnD06aO6ebWus1a3wlv gDtXMEp5Mc3MUE7bVeg0Imh6aLeUZ530a6wj6pipGWXj9WxO7/Ii2yiq649o5oag voQREiZBT06mH9QTzP6PSCEmB/8j3m/SLWdmFRFsDksHBPqml1cl2babl+G/5Msr YF0m11p/8FXQVPEsZcPXRHWrl4wIyciusWTtf7ZNVD2o9TSlCB6mudR9bzXkyPu8 duc0f5ON8Zh8PURyIikQb5go+CHlQFdpg6hoknM4NQ7KxVxon+uuexRR8SsA5PYJ 7xNluOJAJidJRU8n2XAyqGh7zJzRGSKuiezMYoUcCtiZoy3dUqfQWeeSB0KGRwQr NXk3Ln9cOd8qGmI2UaxuU4jAJjpRwBlvJ5QqmYV8g4tP23YtNyHT1UVcNeOIe4hT 3GhPazJgH7ephAUz0nfnkj+usQ9U6yqSmCSc1+MbNDIXdIJLAcdY0NrwBsxFy+sX 4b6H7u2QU6nlij8Sh5qQP8mF5lr/rcIqsvlQS1/hl3iLuc12oFgSk/L2/CSsbhsx dw45QrLXwTHehHIkNrtUelV7ZWtckd+VYf3vvcXoEF7H9Zcuxl8sHSP1zI2bzw6R yXd7j50xnXJGYolJnEur =lNr+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCA02DDD63BF0A74229E5959A--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FF47C73.6070108>