From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org Mon Dec 11 23:23:51 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4BDEA25C8 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90DF7EF09 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from yv.noip.me (c-24-6-186-56.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.186.56]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id vBBNNTwT016566 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:23:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-24-6-186-56.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.186.56] claimed to be yv.noip.me Subject: Re: http subversion URLs should be discontinued in favor of https URLs To: Yonas Yanfa Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <97f76231-dace-10c4-cab2-08e5e0d792b5@rawbw.com> <2a6d123c-8ee5-8e1e-d99b-4bce02345308@rawbw.com> <1217.1512685566@critter.freebsd.dk> <20171208082503.cve4526nkwf7chef@localhost> <201712112129.vBBLT7tj006260@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> <225f2891-dc04-0e38-05bb-b4af9645f663@fizk.net> From: Yuri Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:23:28 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <225f2891-dc04-0e38-05bb-b4af9645f663@fizk.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:23:51 -0000 On 12/11/17 14:40, Yonas Yanfa wrote: > I prefer HTTPS over HTTP as well, but wouldn't switching over to git > and using signed commits be even more secure than using HTTPS? So far, nobody pointed out even one security flaw of using https combined with the private CA. So no, they appear to be equally secure, with https approach having the advantage of being able to work on the same infrastructure in virtually the same way. Yuri