From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 22 21:23:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA6016A41F for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 21:23:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars.tunkrans@bredband.net) Received: from mxfep02.bredband.com (mxfep02.bredband.com [195.54.107.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EE443D48 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 21:23:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars.tunkrans@bredband.net) Received: from [192.168.245.40] ([213.112.167.254] [213.112.167.254]) by mxfep02.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20050922212309.HUAN11792.mxfep02.bredband.com@[192.168.245.40]>; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:23:09 +0200 Message-ID: <433320C2.7020108@bredband.net> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:23:14 +0200 From: Lars Tunkrans User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ken Gunderson References: <20050922104410.30caf3ce.kgunders@teamcool.net> In-Reply-To: <20050922104410.30caf3ce.kgunders@teamcool.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 90nm core opterons scrapped? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 21:23:13 -0000 Well they are listed as an existing item . punch in 244 in the model number dialouge at: http://www.amdcompare.com/us%2Den/opteron/ However they do seem to be a tad old today as the 254 model is a whole Gigahertz faster Why do you need them ? //Lars Ken Gunderson wrote: >Hello All: > >I just had a supplier inform me per AMD that 90nm core Opteron 244's >"got scrapped and will not be producing them for the time being" and >that only units inproduction are 130nm CG stepping. Yet I do seem to >recall Opterons w/ E4 stepping being referenced here. Can anyone shed >some light on this for me? > >TIA > > >