From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 28 05:39:11 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAF616A420;
	Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:39:11 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com)
Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F098043D49;
	Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:39:10 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com)
Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328C917206;
	Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:39:01 +0200 (EET)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:38:54 +0200
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com>
To: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20060228073854.716b85d8@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <B6B3D504-8419-435B-9F90-2970A49ECDA8@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20060228040930.GA52553@crodrigues.org>
	<DCC32FCD-C03D-4562-AACD-7E0A8FB815FA@FreeBSD.org>
	<20060228065036.0b3f2ae3@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
	<B6B3D504-8419-435B-9F90-2970A49ECDA8@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org>, Ade, Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>,
	freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What broke with libtool upgrade? (devel/apr-svn)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:39:11 -0000

On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:28:32 -0800
Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> 
> On Feb 27, 2006, at 20:50 , Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > Somewhere, somehow ./configure picks bash if in PATH and uses it as
> > CONFIG_SHELL (I build the port by
> > mv /usr/local/bin/bash /usr/local/bin/back.tmp; make); why does it need
> > to do this when CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/sh in CONFIGURE_ENV  I can't tell.
> 
> Ah hah!
> 
> Because the port Makefile target is using:

And, of course, I was scrathing my head looking in config* to understand
why it picks bash and not sh.
 
>          cd ${WRKDIR}/apr-${PORTVERSION}; \
>                  ${SETENV} ${SCRIPTS_ENV} ${SH} ./configure $ 
> {CONFIGURE_ARGS}
>          cd ${WRKDIR}/apr-util-${PORTVERSION}; \
>                  ${SETENV} ${SCRIPTS_ENV} ${SH} \
>                  ./configure ${CONFIGURE_ARGS} ${APR_UTIL_CONF_ARGS}
> 
> Those two references to ${SCRIPTS_ENV} should be ${CONFIGURE_ENV}.

Changed all _three_ to CONFIGURE_ENV and it passed a make install :)
 
> However, given that things have worked in the past, this would  
> suggest that there is something of a flaw in the current bash port.

Strange.


-- 
IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

All your people must learn before you can reach for the stars.
		-- Kirk, "The Gamesters of Triskelion", stardate 3259.2