From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Apr 16 12:37:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA16352 for isp-outgoing; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 12:37:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.mexcom.net (root@ns.mexcom.net [206.103.64.9]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA16346 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 12:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sunix (eculp@sunix.mexcom.net [206.103.64.3]) by ns.mexcom.net (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA05636; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 14:36:50 -0500 Message-ID: <33552A4E.116C73E4@mexcom.net> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 14:36:46 -0500 From: Edwin Culp Organization: Mexico Communicates, S.C. X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; Linux 2.0.14 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brandon Gillespie CC: Neal , Damian Hamill , David Langford , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Credit Card software References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Brandon Gillespie wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Apr 1997, Neal wrote: > > IC-Verify definately still sells a UNIX version of their software. They > > tried to sell it to me last week. > > > > On Wed, 16 Apr 1997, Damian Hamill wrote: > > > > > David Langford wrote: > > > > > > > > Does anyone use and recommend and Credit Card processing software > > > > to debit account that runs under FreeBSD? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > -David Langford > > > > langfod@dihelix.com > > > > > > I believe there are only PC-DOS based products currently available. We > > > are planning to add this to our product (which runs on FreeBSD) but I'm > > > so busy with other things that I don't know when it will be available. > > I have written a Visa POS Port network server which runs in FreeBSD. If > there is interest I can find out about licencing it from my employer (Sun > Remarketing). Note: it does NOT do any security encryption at the network > layer--it assumes your network is secure (i.e. not internet connected, or > firewalled). Implementing a secure layer is just too much work. > > -Brandon Gillespie I for one am very interested. I would rather start at 10 than at 0 anytime. ed