From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 25 23:20:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F5A16A420 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 23:20:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B634043D49 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 23:20:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t13so999011wxc for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:20:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=azZy4rXhyqT9Pa8hyfgDXIcPQc8Nt+9289H0P4wKoI0FwdPNBBogga2JF20hJHtToVSDTn+eMSP6ro/WkD9wQSKc2ssIJhiHsZD51Xb2KZHuP48fL1GxTYVE+LuDeOqMQv+QQVe7pelRx2g3JoiJfmoqfRzzn/7n+19GVScftyY= Received: by 10.70.105.17 with SMTP id d17mr2025712wxc; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.7.230]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id i19sm2133808wxd.2005.09.25.16.20.40; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:20:50 -0700 (PDT) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: portmgr@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:59:52 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509251559.53576.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk,v 1.517 2005/09/15 12:24:33 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 23:20:51 -0000 Is it possible/desirable to modify bsd.port.mk so that ports marked IGNORE or BROKEN exit with an error code, like "make check-conflicts" does if there is a conflict? Right now there is a problem with sysutils/portmanager not properly handling ports marked BROKEN because make seems to exit with no error. I could add parsing Makefiles for the term "BROKEN" to portmanager, but that seems a shame, because untill now portmanager has never needed to snoop the insides of Makefiles. thank you Mike Shultz (portmanager author)