From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Oct 12 13:53:52 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA00236 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 12 Oct 1996 13:53:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [128.120.56.38]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA00229 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 1996 13:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id NAA26632; Sat, 12 Oct 1996 13:53:54 -0700 (PDT) From: "David E. O'Brien" Message-Id: <199610122053.NAA26632@relay.nuxi.com> Subject: Re: is someone doing a mutt port ?! If not I will... To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm) Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 13:53:54 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org (FreeBSD ports list) In-Reply-To: from Andreas Klemm at "Oct 12, 96 02:03:50 pm" X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Is someone already doing a mutt port ?! If not I'd do ... Yep, but it changes every week. I've got a port that actaully works anyway, but records the version number as 0.0. Should I submit it now, or wait until mutt is not such a moving target? I could at least make it available on my ftp site I guess. Note that Mutt works quite well on FreeBSD. I've been playing with it since version 0.1, and our own Ollivier Robert is very active in making patches for it. -- David (obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu)