Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:02:16 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, thierry@herbelot.com, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Subject: Re: Porting NVidia linux kernel modules to FreeBSD Message-ID: <XFMail.010312100216.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103120305180.22991-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11-Mar-01 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > It is, at least for me. I've been waiting for XFree86 4.0.x to come > > up to the same FPS performance numbers since it came out. > So, are you saying that 3.3.6 performs better than 4.0.2? If this is true > I might dump 4.0.2 and go for 3.3.6 (luckily there's server with ttf > support builtin). Well, in 3d it is better because you can use Utah-GLX with 3.3.6 but not 4.x. In 3d 3.3.6 is worse because it doesn't accelerate 24bit displays (and maybe other aspects). DRI would be nice, but nVidia don't agree so the Linux foo would be next best. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.010312100216.doconnor>