From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jul 28 17:18:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA22119 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Tue, 28 Jul 1998 17:18:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from localhost.my.domain (ppp1712.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.249.176]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA21978; Tue, 28 Jul 1998 17:18:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ac199@hwcn.org) Received: (from tim@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA18496; Tue, 28 Jul 1998 20:17:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tim) Message-ID: <19980728201711.A18440@zappo> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 20:17:11 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Satoshi Asami , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: comment on new categories? References: <199807281607.JAA23186@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <199807281607.JAA23186@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>; from Satoshi Asami on Tue, Jul 28, 1998 at 09:07:26AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Jul 28, 1998 at 09:07:26AM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote: > > The only reason why I'm terse is because "x11-windowmanagers" or [...] > But may be right, maybe we shouldn't be too terse for the sake of > developers. What do others think? I'd suggest x11-windowmangers if I were to suggest anything. I don't see either as being too terribly much worse than the other, though. -- Tim Vanderhoek (who still things we need games/minesweepers ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message