From owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Sun Mar 13 05:31:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F82ACE291 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 05:31:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 778E58B3 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 05:31:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u2D5VE1I014723 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 05:31:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 207598] pf adds icmp unreach on gre/ipsec somehow Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 05:31:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kp@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 05:31:14 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D207598 --- Comment #1 from Kristof Provost --- It doesn't look like a very simple setup, so ideally I'd like you to try to simplify it a bit. For example, is the ipsec bit required, or does it happen with just the GRE tunnels as well? It'd also be interesting to know if it happens both with and without 'scrub fragment reassemble'. Do you have anything 'special' in your pf.conf? (That is, route-to, dup-to, set state-policy, ... basically anything not pass or block.) (PS: I seem to be unable to send e-mail to you. Your mail server keeps tell= ing me '452 4.7.1 Try again later') --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=