From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 3 09:21:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA09077 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 09:21:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from tarpon.exis.net (stefan@tarpon.exis.net [205.252.72.108]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA09071 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 09:21:24 -0800 (PST) Received: (from stefan@localhost) by tarpon.exis.net (8.7.4/8.7.3) id MAA30137; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 12:24:13 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 12:24:12 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Molnar To: Intuitive Design Info cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stronghold or Zeus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Wondering if people out there are using stronghold or zeus for a > ssl solution. Any pros or cons? Any other suggestions? Go for stronghold. It is a good program for ssl. We use that where I work. Also I kinda know the CEO of c2, so that is another plus on my side. Stefan -------------------------------------------- Stefan Molnar Team Exis.Net stefan@exis.net Member EFF Slightly Silly Team OS/2 east-coast-ambassador@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU "She turned me into a Newt! A Newt? I got better." -Monty Python --------------------------------------------