From owner-freebsd-chat  Wed Jun 18 05:10:17 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA13117
          for chat-outgoing; Wed, 18 Jun 1997 05:10:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper.itribe.net (gatekeeper.itribe.net [209.49.144.254])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA13111;
          Wed, 18 Jun 1997 05:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706181211.IAA10652@gatekeeper.itribe.net>
Received: forwarded by SMTP 1.6.0.
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 08:10:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jamie Bowden <jamie@itribe.net>
To: Greg Lehey <grog@freebsd.org>
cc: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: TCL
In-Reply-To: <199706180108.JAA00340@papillon.lemis.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 18 Jun 1997, Greg Lehey wrote:

> I won't disagree with any of this.  I just disagree with the concept
> of having to use different languages for different purposes.  (dons
> asbestos underwear) As far as I am concerned, there are three
> languages: (Bourne) shell, awk, and C.  Sure, it takes more effort to
> write some things in C than it would in perl or tcl, but you don't get
> boxed in so easily.

So your next FreeBSD book will be in C, sh, and awk?  Should make for a
very interesting read.  :)

Jamie Bowden

System Administrator, iTRiBE.net