From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 23 02:24:17 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C6016A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 23 Jan 2004 02:24:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9075043D1D
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 23 Jan 2004 02:24:12 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org)
Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0NAQQCG028246;
	Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:26:26 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org)
Received: (from bulk@localhost)
	by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0NAQPNE028245;
	Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:26:25 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: ei.bzerk.org: bulk set sender to mail25@bzerk.org
	using -f
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:26:25 +0100
From: Ruben de Groot <mail25@bzerk.org>
To: Peter Risdon <peter@circlesquared.com>
Message-ID: <20040123102625.GA27890@ei.bzerk.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot <mail25@bzerk.org>,
	Peter Risdon <peter@circlesquared.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <4010DF2B.1070804@ant.uni-bremen.de>
	<20040123091337.GA46755@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
	<4010EE2E.3050200@circlesquared.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4010EE2E.3050200@circlesquared.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: How dangerous is 5.2 for production use
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:24:17 -0000

On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:49:34AM +0000, Peter Risdon typed:
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
> 
> >Certainly. You will find it better suited to the large filesystems
> >
> >you have than UFS1.  I also have a vague feeling that background fsck
> >is a UFS2 feature, but I can't find documentation to either confirm or
> >deny that.
> >
> > 
> >
> I'm sure this is right. If one of my 5.* machines has an un-clean 
> shutdown it states that it is starting background fsck checks as it 
> completes its boot process.

True, but not only on UFS2. It works just as well on UFS1 filesystems.

Ruben

> PWR.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"