From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 30 11: 7:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from accord.grasslake.net (accord.grasslake.net [206.11.249.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DA937B6AC for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from marlowe (accord.grasslake.net [206.11.249.240]) by accord.grasslake.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f0UJ18m95207 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:01:08 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Message-ID: <009d01c08aef$f7640d00$b8209fc0@marlowe> From: "Shawn Barnhart" To: References: <20010130154019.C13001@lucifer.bart.nl> <20010130132927.A8712@pit.databus.com> Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:08:01 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barney Wolff" > I built and installed /usr/ports/net/bind9 with no problems on a > 4.2 stable from 1/19/01. It goes in /usr/local/sbin and works > just fine for me. Command args are different and it's a bit > pickier about the zone files, but getting it running took only > a few minutes. Added benefit is I can fall back without pain. Speaking of bind9, are there any plans to replace bind8 with bind9 in the core FreeBSD system, or is 9 considered still too new? I understand that 8.2.3 fixes the current round of security bugs, but reading the ISC web site I get the impression they're pushing the 9.x series over the 8 series. My own understanding is that 9.x is a major improvement in codebase (as in total rewrite) over the 8.x series, but I imagine if I'm wrong someone will correct me... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message