Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2018 00:22:54 +0300 From: Greg V <greg@unrelenting.technology> To: CL Moonriver <clmoonriver@equinedreams.art> Cc: Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org>, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, pkubaj@anongoth.pl Subject: Re: X11 not working on 11-STABLE with AMDGPU Message-ID: <1533331374.1685.0@hraggstad.unrelenting.technology> In-Reply-To: <73d85e29-be1d-a8a8-0fe9-81889a4a429f@equinedreams.art> References: <20180801092849.GA75303@KGPE-D16> <95b8cfa0-0908-3321-5155-ef49b1bb0a64@equinedreams.art> <20180801141207.GA5202@smtp.iq.pl> <d4f521ba-eaa7-1464-d7b6-b28560781bfc@nomadlogic.org> <4266f156-3a83-a45d-fab0-cde090c139ba@equinedreams.art> <67630578-f418-b435-9bb0-b40f12e9d881@nomadlogic.org> <1533215599.23824.0@hraggstad.unrelenting.technology> <73d85e29-be1d-a8a8-0fe9-81889a4a429f@equinedreams.art>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:16 AM, CL Moonriver=20 <clmoonriver@equinedreams.art> wrote: > Thanks for the heads up. >=20 > Are you sure this is still relevant in drm-next? I don't see any=20 > dmesg error about disabling GPU acceleration. I did what you=20 > suggested, but nothing seems to have changed except I get no text=20 > until radeonkms has loaded (I don't get garbage I get nothing at=20 > all). I still get dmesg errors regarding ring test failures and such,=20 > so turning the EFI framebuffer off doesn't appear to have actually=20 > changed anything. Interesting. Are you 100% sure you're booting with UEFI, not CSM/legacy? Maybe radeonkms doesn't conflict anymore. Maybe this depends on the GPU=20 model or something? For amdgpu (RX 480), it's not an error about disabling acceleration,=20 the amdgpu driver *completely* fails to load when EFI framebuffer is=20 active. And I retested a few weeks ago. No one fixed this specifically=20 yet, so I'm not expecting it to magically stop conflicting=85 =
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1533331374.1685.0>