From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 29 20:00:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86ED8175 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x232.google.com (mail-ie0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE221CA5 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id aq17so8026952iec.9 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:00:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=i7SZdDswCEXvl3r7vcHUNVSpiQG/ohJGq/+T7tZlUqU=; b=TLMqf+SK+D9tWDRE7Waf74ml1qRa+K3EBwDZzp0ET1H/ek4BUXj7flDfIxgM2/cCdS ZcOC72JidO9KLBPnF3KL79or69Z742atnV4UUfAq3PA9Zlc9brZ156gxpgxy/a3URBY6 +20rIxpZa/aObMzeuyOwniUSWkGyucH81GNmegfhEC0wYyUbuIvYbIUAKh7Bl2f7vsSJ 8Igbgqk9+ASGY9ewoA8kKdLWCMwfgXqIG9KzcMdsF8OkckB/tIGMglTnx4PaZt8T2R2a Hw3B7h/gc0rIQHGGtEyeSIXex31qBE4Z//ypjSuIQ6Givh/dmta+6XT2w0GVrJHwYpou SYcQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.114.3 with SMTP id jc3mr1979475igb.75.1367265600673; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.58.52 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.58.52 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:00:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <517EC419.9060501@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20130428070851.60d08788@scorpio> <20130428131704.1eb14721@scorpio> <517E0443.2050804@delphij.net> <20130429071307.50874b19@scorpio> <517EB1C0.4020409@FreeBSD.org> <20130429142648.089ed8fe@scorpio> <517EC419.9060501@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:00:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: openldap-2.4.35: "failed to start slapd" From: Chris Rees To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:00:01 -0000 On 29 Apr 2013 20:04, "Matthew Seaman" wrote: > > On 29/04/2013 19:26, Jerry wrote: > > Thanks Matthew, I was wondering if I would have to rebuild the > > database. I kind of thought that I would. One question though, why > > "WITH_BDB_VER?=5" instead of the same setting sans the "?" question > > mark? Plus, is there really a need for a space or tab between the > > directive and the setting? I have seen several such flags using one > > style or the other. Is it just a matter of style or does it actually > > make any difference? > > '?=' means 'assign if variable is not already initialised' -- so it > allows ports to override your choice of settings; for instance if you > wanted to install a port that only worked with an earlier version of BDB. I'm pretty sure ?= is inappropriate here; make.conf is read first(ish) and thus WITH_OPENLDAP_VER should not be defined at this point. Chris