From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 7 08:34:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097A216C4A2; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 08:23:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [195.131.4.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E4743D49; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 08:23:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.18.98.64] (brmea-proxy-3.Sun.COM [192.18.98.64]) (authenticated bits=0) by ftp.translate.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k578NPYF000689; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 12:23:27 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <44868D3C.4040102@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 12:24:28 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergey Matveychuk References: <4485DBF5.3070705@FreeBSD.org> <1903867106.20060607001337@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4485E6AE.9070208@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4485E6AE.9070208@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: portupgrade ideas page X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 08:34:02 -0000 Sergey Matveychuk wrote: >> SM> Portupgrade ideas page was created on our wiki server: >> SM> http://wiki.freebsd.org/portupgrade >> SM> I would like to hear your ideas, wishes and comments. >> Parallel download/build. I ahve bunch of not-so-fast computers (started with iP-II-266) on not-so-fast internet connections (from 256Kbit ADSL to 33.6 modem line). And when here are many ports to upgrade AND download (because it is not port revision change, but real upgrade of software) it will be much faster to download NEXT distfile for port to upgrade when build current one. > I think it's great, but I'm not sure I'll do it soon. > But I plan to implement some locking mechanism to allow to run a few > portupgrade processes safely. It should be sophisticated lock mechanism, to prevent build depended ports before dependee ones. -- // Lev Serebryakov