From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 17:59:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84766106564A for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:59:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aehlig@linta.de) Received: from linta.de (isilmar-3.linta.de [188.40.101.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18B08FC08 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1116 invoked by uid 10); 1 Jun 2011 17:59:35 -0000 Received: from kta1c10 by isilmar.linta.de with BSMTP; 1 Jun 2011 17:59:35 -0000 Received: by kta1c10.sesnet.soton.ac.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C95223981D; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:59:26 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:59:26 +0100 From: "Klaus T. Aehlig" To: Sergey Kandaurov Message-ID: <20110601175926.GB60894@kta1c10.sesnet.soton.ac.uk> References: <20110601152713.GB51073@kta1c10.sesnet.soton.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:10:29 +0000 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fdopendir prototype on 7.3-RELEASE amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:59:39 -0000 > > I have reports that indicate that this problem also seems to exist on 7.3-RELEASE-p4 amd64 > > and 8.1-RELEASE i386. The above program does not segfault on my 8.2-STABLE amd64. > > Can you recheck it for 8.1? It should not be so. Yes, you're right. On 8.1 there is no problem. So that was probably a misunderstanding in a private mail with the submitter of the earlier mentioned PR. Thanks for your comments. BTW, are there plans to merge this header fix back into an errata for 7.3-RELEASE? I'm just curious, as, if not, more gnu software might run into a similar problem as the misc/findutils port. Best regards, Klaus