From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 29 18:12:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2EAA8B for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:12:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from raven.bwct.de (raven.bwct.de [85.159.14.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DBC15C9 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:12:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cicely.de ([10.1.1.37]) by raven.bwct.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id r3THhqN5080031 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:43:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (cicely7.cicely.de [10.1.1.9]) by mail.cicely.de (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3THhgLH062907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:43:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely7.cicely.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r3THhgRB065082; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:43:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely7.cicely.de (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id r3THhf3j065081; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:43:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:43:41 +0200 From: Bernd Walter To: Alexander Yerenkow Subject: Re: Light humour Message-ID: <20130429174341.GC47072@cicely7.cicely.de> References: <517CE158.3000006@freebsd.org> <517D55A9.4060806@zoho.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely7.cicely.de 7.0-STABLE i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on spamd.cicely.de Cc: freebsd-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:12:32 -0000 On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 09:07:15PM +0300, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > Not criticizing, just commenting. > I heard such utter nonsense sometimes, in which people do believe despite > all common sense, that I'm not amused, but scared :) Well - I don't see a problem with this. The people who don't understand enough to believe this crap won't use any BSD and go to Linux instead. It all contribute to the same quality as Linux already is. Type "netstat -nr" and you don't get IPv6 routing table - even windows agrees to traditional netstat -nr behavour... Interface isolation for ARP requests - what's that? Want to know link states use some strange tools. We all can extend this list forever. You just need to look at bootmessages to know how inconsistent Linux is. I didn't read all of the text, but the tiny bit is already failing logic in itself, which is the main reason why it is funny after all. I don't want any of those persons who believe this text anywhere else than on the other side. > This blog is humor to very small, limited group of people, and at same time > it's anti-bsd blog to bigger audience, who will not bother read some lines, > instead peek in title, get few words here, few there, and close it. In they > memory will be essence - that *BSD is suck, probably not allover, but they > will remember that there are exist areas in which BSD have big problems. > Mix this with lacking `nextgen techs` like KMS, decent virtualization > level, no utf-8 in console and other myths, partial myths, or obsolete > problems of old releases, and you'll receive bad opinion on BSD. > But, there's not much to be done actually :) -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.