From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 2 0:56:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDFE37B405 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 00:56:13 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id fB28ted90601; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 00:55:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 00:55:40 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200112020855.fB28ted90601@apollo.backplane.com> To: Danny Braniss Cc: Richard Sharpe , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch #2 (was Re: Found the problem, w/patch (was Re: FreeBSD performing worse than Linux?)) References: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :> slightly better results with Patch #3 and delayed acks turned on. :> :> -Matt :i did not apply any patches - yet -, net.inet.tcp.newreno is 1, on both hosts. :they are connected at 100mb, so the strange numbers are when the number of :clients is > 3! (att 100Mbit/sec how come i get > 100?) It's a synchronous protocol, so the number of bits per byte is not necessarily 10... it can be 8, 9, or 10. Approximately. : danny :PS: just forgot, congrat on a terrific job!!! im still amazed -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message