From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 27 08:08:23 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B663F2AE4 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 08:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BzdZH36Lgz4gvh for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 08:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6AAA33F2D25; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 08:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7213F2BA7 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 08:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BzdZH2FDNz4h8b for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 08:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 165389F93 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 08:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08R88McB020707 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 08:08:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 08R88M9L020706 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 08:08:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 245702] x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-legacy does not work under 12.1 Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 08:08:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: manu@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 08:08:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245702 Emmanuel Vadot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |manu@freebsd.org --- Comment #19 from Emmanuel Vadot --- (In reply to Alexey Dokuchaev from comment #18) > Probably should work in theory, but does not necessarily work in practice= , see > my comment #8. I don't see where this message can come from. (In reply to Alexey Dokuchaev from comment #18) > I'm motivated, albeit unskilled, to fix support for pre-GCN cards. > Technically this should be doable because they definitely used to work 2-= 3=20 > years ago. However, I still can't decide whether I should start with fig= uring=20 > out when the base DRM bits (or drm-legacy-kmod port) got broken, or forge= t=20 > about the legacy bits and work with the new code provided by the latest=20 > drm-{current,devel}-kmod ports. It's not possible to compare the last code that was in sys/dev/drm2 with ev= en the first drm-kmod. drm-kmod didn't originated from the sys/dev/drm2 code, it was started to be port from scratch from the Linux code with Linuxkpi. If radeonkms doesn't work for you on -CURRENT (I insist on -CURRENT as it's= the only branch activelly supported right now) please create a new issue at https://github.com/freebsd/drm-kmod/. Note that it works for powerpc64 for = some devices and while it doesn't mean that it might work on i386 or with the hardware that you have it means that it's not dead code. I suggest you first try the image I've made a few weeks ago, see https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2020-September/077024.h= tml for the links. (In reply to Alexey Dokuchaev from comment #18) > While NI (the last pre-GCN family) was released back in 2010, it had been= used > for several years in AMD APU-based laptops. I've purchased mine in= 2016 and=20 > it was still using it, so amdgpu(4) is not an option for me. What brand/model is that ? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=