From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Nov 10 13:58:56 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA07565
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 13:58:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA07560
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 13:58:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with SMTP id NAA25171; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 13:57:00 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <32864F96.41C67EA6@whistle.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 13:56:38 -0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Organization: Whistle Communications
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julian Assange <proff@suburbia.net>
CC: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: virtual hosting with inetd
References: <199611090643.RAA23191@suburbia.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Julian Assange wrote:
> 
> Does anyone have any other comments on the patch
> I produced? Terry, did I address yours?
> Is it commitable?

they are definitly useful, and we might need them in the near future..
I need to look at xinetd some time to see how much should be added to 
our inetd and how much should be considered "use xinetd instead".