Date: Tue, 4 Apr 1995 19:23:25 -0700 (PDT) From: bmk@dtr.com To: julian@TFS.COM (Julian Elischer) Cc: rkw@dataplex.net, smmcgee@ncbc.edu, questions@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SATAN ported?? Message-ID: <199504050223.TAA21370@dtr.com> In-Reply-To: <m0rwK2P-0003w6C@TFS.COM> from "Julian Elischer" at Apr 4, 95 06:37:40 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm going to have a go at porting perl5 tonight - I'll let everyone know how it goes. One thing bothers me. I can run SATAN locally to test my own network, but I have no capability to run it remotely. The only other network that I have sufficient access to is not very well connected (all access to the Internet is via a 9600bps SLIP link on a proxy gateway - the gateway doesn't have the resources to run it, and it'd be painfully slow besides). I don't know how effective this tool will be running "on the inside". The only other options I have for running it personally are on systems with sysadmins that I do not fully trust. I'd like to enlist the help of someone to probe my site - but for obvious reasons, it must be someone trustworthy. What's a sysadmin to do? :) > we need to do that here too.... > let me know if your get it done.. > I can set it up on REF.tfs.com and we can use it as a service to beat on each > other's systems :) > > > > "Sean McGee" <smmcgee@jasper.ncbc.edu> writes: > > >So, who's going to port SATAN so that we have some kind of defense? > > > > Who has ported perl5? We must have that as a tool to make SATAN work. > > > > ---- > > Richard Wackerbarth > > rkw@dataplex.net > > > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504050223.TAA21370>