From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jul 8 06:26:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0332B8580B for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 06:26:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (prod2.absolight.net [79.143.243.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E93F1153 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 06:26:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2CFBDC66 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 08:26:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 48506BDC2E for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 08:26:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD496453A7F for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 08:26:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 08:26:30 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: [HEADSUP] change in default openssl coming Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========726778A48D9A0D2F70CC==========" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 06:26:33 -0000 --==========726778A48D9A0D2F70CC========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, During this summer (sometime in August I think) I will be changing the default OpenSSL for the ports tree from the base system version to security/openssl. I will also, because it goes with it, change the default GSSAPI from base to something else, I think the consensus was to use the MIT version, which is security/krb5. Before I do that, it would be nice if people who actually use Kerberos (so, that's the two of you at the back) could provide some feedback if it changing this will break things. -- Mathieu Arnold --==========726778A48D9A0D2F70CC========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXf0eWXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IiXcP/R8UIY1u9oEII4Tg0DS9omvs ImwKyLvKHl2eV0dOGtbF195RKsgWSU9LyXuw/zE+2B1AdD+nswayVgCXUOmi45C5 cIoPnUrAeaxZjZp60MuA/O9fr3egoAFzHu3mqX0bhaexcnm9Pu9+yp0Jo+qUiQgc h65nU+6x4cjEXUJxl8NHD2JZ1cTy58BcXhZLu36RpwVv+S6Oit4Qpt6AH58G/8Vj 5JSWSstTXjXRQDkkjsXOEkdCh93rTJezoaOmlnzhy6dWH78PsuM6S36wUZyoIyrS 63PFzdvU3B/9GD3jDOT6UhD/dC9ktONd58IuMKXYfIN+kaIhZ6TRDlhxbVNAAL6R uaHPqU2jvBm03dNAlNsbebhIz+cmdoIK3UGpDcGAnk7wLxtchP6Rr6rxMo79yGm+ QcSjJ2oGxoHxzYnuGZzs6L38xrWjmzzwAX2auXDOZMc3d617/yzlNaj7j6qpR5Jw twVX9MZd6CsYYu0M32x+eX83TrrD5kU2r2IxJsMca303RToXyzDLoBJ46wyKaYsf o00xqJGqxKJJ1GDCF8fI1zbvJH/JcjoZIWDOWaGbS4B6Gvd+3rPXcJBx4rn4lYxX t4zyNBxA9RPaaE4kz2C9PblnJJIhL09Zsr2DBWCYC4O4d3XfY3Wd6/jVJiIL/Ezk zt/CVgvUcZX0134nfg8X =nJMB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========726778A48D9A0D2F70CC==========--