From owner-freebsd-bugs  Fri Dec 13 22:49:03 1996
Return-Path: <owner-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id WAA14341
          for bugs-outgoing; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 22:49:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id WAA14335;
          Fri, 13 Dec 1996 22:48:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA19319; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 22:48:54 -0800 (PST)
To: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
cc: Mike Pritchard <mpp@freefall.freebsd.org>,
        gnats-admin@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pending/2089 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Dec 1996 18:07:54 PST."
             <96Dec13.180804pst.177711@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> 
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 22:48:53 -0800
Message-ID: <19316.850546133@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In similar cases, we take the lack of a reply as an implied "yes!" :-)

					Jordan

> In message <199612122207.OAA10569@freefall.freebsd.org> you write:
> >Moved from pending to correct area.
> 
> You should make them non-confidential, too, so that they show up on
> the open bug lists and the web page queries.  I sent email to all of
> the originators of these bugs asking if it was OK for me to make them
> non-confidential but nobody replied so I didn't do anything.
> 
>   Bill