From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 8 03:42:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8819A106566C for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FA28FC0C for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:42:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.local (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by pooker.samsco.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n383S4mE034212; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 21:28:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <49DC19C3.1000702@samsco.org> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:28:03 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcel Moolenaar References: <24C524FA-2D87-4A0E-97B7-4D7C832B3E72@mac.com> <74181BF8-E111-4208-8C3E-8F1B39808E0B@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <74181BF8-E111-4208-8C3E-8F1B39808E0B@mac.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: arm@freebsd.org, pluknet , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Root mount fails again. CAM related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 03:42:15 -0000 Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > On Apr 7, 2009, at 11:22 AM, pluknet wrote: > >>> My ARM board boots from a USB mass storage device and >>> for the second time the the root mount fails. First is >>> was because the root mount wouldn't wait for the USB >>> stack to complete the discovery process. Now CAM seems >>> to have entered the picture: >>> > >> Can this be a similar one? That was committed not far ago in rev. 190676. >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-April/005635.html > > It could be the cause of the problem. Things worked fine > before CAM grew calls to root_mount_hold()... > Feel free to back the change out of CAM. I don't have time to go through and explain why it was a poor idea in the first place, nor to figure out what in USB is broken. Scott