Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:21:23 -0600 From: eculp <eculp@encontacto.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple ISP routing by port Message-ID: <20090128082123.16165k6k6s2ftlgc@econet.encontacto.net> In-Reply-To: <200901270704.36034.max@love2party.net> References: <20090127051809.GA21017@fireburns.net> <200901270704.36034.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Max Laier <max@love2party.net>:
> On Tuesday 27 January 2009 06:18:09 jmaps-fbsdnet@fireburns.net wrote:
>> I've read through what I could find in this list and also in the top 50
>> results on google... I can't find anything that'll actually make this wor=
k.
>>
>> My DSL ISP is too far away to give me anything faster than 1.5mbps down. =
In
>> despiration I signed up for comcast to use for bulk traffic.
>>
>> Thus, I want to route critical traffic (22, 25, 53, (maybe) 80, 443)
>> through the DSL provider and the rest through cable.
>>
>> I really feel like this should be possible with PF with something like:
>>
>> nat on $dsl_if from ($int_if:network) to any port $dslports -> ($dsl_if)
>> nat on $cbl_if from ($int_if:network) to any -> ($cbl_if)
>>
>> or
>>
>> pass in quick on $int_if route-to { ($dsl_if $dsl_gw) } proto { tcp udp }
>> from ($int_if:network) to any port $dslports
>>
>> Neither (or both) seem to do it. All traffic ends up getting routed throu=
gh
>> whichever ISP i have set as the default route.
>
> Take a look at: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing
>
I was aware of the round robin load balancing but I, as the poster, am =20
interested in what is referred to "critical traffic" through one ISP =20
and all other through a second. How would that be accomplished with =20
pf and or with Julian's fib's ?
Thanks,
ed
> You are probably missing the following part of the setup:
> | To ensure that packets with a source address belonging to $ext_if1 are
> | always routed to $ext_gw1 (and similarly for $ext_if2 and $ext_gw2), the
> | following two lines should be included in the ruleset:
> |
> | pass out on $ext_if1 route-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) from $ext_if2 \
> | to any
> | pass out on $ext_if2 route-to ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1) from $ext_if1 \
> | to any
>
> This obviously has to be adapted for you specific setup - but in general t=
his
> works as expected.
>
>> Now, I hear i can go over to linux and just configure both default routes
>> at the same time (trivial with iproute2). But I'd rather avoid that if at
>> all possible.
>>
>> Is there some trick I'm missing? Does quagga (bgpd) allow for this kind o=
f
>> routing scheme?
>
> --
> /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org
> \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
> X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet
> / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090128082123.16165k6k6s2ftlgc>