From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 4 23:45:48 2001 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 4 23:45:46 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (dhcp244.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.244]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4943937B402 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 23:45:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f057vbt03988; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 23:57:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200101050757.f057vbt03988@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Graham Wheeler Cc: Warner Losh , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Just how standard is APM? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 05 Jan 2001 07:48:48 +0200." <3A556040.6B9163BB@cequrux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 23:57:37 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Warner Losh wrote: > > > > APM is standard. Except when it is broken in some brain damaged ways. > > > > However, you likely have your apm device disabled in your kernel and > > all you need to do is enable it. > > > > Nope - as I said, I added log messages to apm.c to log the BIOS probe > and they log a failure (I have "device apm0" in my config file). How new is this laptop? It may be ACPI-only. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message