From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 4 16:56:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5009816A4B3 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 16:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtaw4.prodigy.net (mtaw4.prodigy.net [64.164.98.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3729B43FDD for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 16:56:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mikko@rsasecurity.com) Received: from atlas (adsl-64-165-199-197.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.165.199.197]) by mtaw4.prodigy.net (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h94NuYIF008420; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 16:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 16:56:34 -0700 (PDT) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= X-X-Sender: mikko@atlas.home To: joe@joe-lewis.com In-Reply-To: <3F7F29C5.7030606@relia.net> Message-ID: <20031004164554.X3248@atlas.home> References: <3F7F29C5.7030606@relia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 23:56:39 -0000 On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Joe Lewis wrote: > Question for you guru's; > > I've been trying to install a PAM module on my FreeBSD 5.1 system. > Unfortunately, someone thought they were bright and included OpenPAM, > which would be fine and dandy except for it is installed by default as > static. This means I PAM is now AM, because nothing is pluggable. And > the documentation on getting a 3rd party module to work is like slitting > your wrists and doing pushups in salt water. Having had some experience writing pam modules on a number of platforms, I whipped out my suite of pam test modules to have a look at this incredbible breakage you speak of. I mean, there is a specification for pam after all. Hmmm... odd; the modules all build and work just fine, modulo some minor tweaks mostly related to gcc 3.x, even though I have never built them on FreeBSD 5 before. Definitely no worse than when porting to certain commercial platforms. > My request is this... I'd like to know if someone has ported Linux-PAM > (the same code from the old 4.x BSD) to the new 5.x OS. If so, do you > have a copy of the ported code? If not, where do I post a copy of the > stuff I am going to have to port so others can use it? Whatever difficulties you are experiencing, I'd say the reason is not specifically related to openpam or FreeBSD 5. Maybe if you post some details, such as source and error messages, someone will be able to help you. Regards, /Mikko Mikko Työläjärvi_______________________________________mikko@rsasecurity.com RSA Security