From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 8 10:56:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A3616A4CE for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:56:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spxau01.smeglobalnet.net (spxau01.smeglobalnet.net [203.57.65.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A73443D4C for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:56:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@bradfieldprichard.com.au) Received: from bpgate.speednet.com.au ([203.41.15.9]) by spxau01.smeglobalnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 8 Nov 2004 21:55:53 +1100 Received: from bpgate.speednet.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) iA8Atq4E059169; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 21:55:52 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from andy@bradfieldprichard.com.au) Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)iA8AtpaL059166; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 21:55:52 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from andy@bradfieldprichard.com.au) X-Authentication-Warning: bpgate.speednet.com.au: andy owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 21:55:51 +1100 (EST) From: Andy Farkas X-X-Sender: andy@bpgate.speednet.com.au To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20041108215243.O59160@bpgate.speednet.com.au> References: <20041107003413.GQ24507@wantadilla.lemis.com> <200411071124.35056.msch@snafu.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-808265141-1099911351=:59160" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2004 10:55:53.0788 (UTC) FILETIME=[84837FC0:01C4C581] cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gvinum remains broken in 5.3-RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 10:56:48 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-808265141-1099911351=:59160 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, [iso-8859-1] Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Andy Farkas writes: >> # gvinum load >> unknown command 'load' > > vinum(8) has no 'load' command, so why do you expect gvinum(8) to have > one? Because manually typing 'gtripe load' after 'boot -s' is the only way=20 I can start my workstation. >> # gvinum unload >> unknown command 'unload' > > vinum(8) has no 'unload' command, so why do you expect gvinum(8) to > have one? Because its the opposite of 'gstripe load'. - andyf --0-808265141-1099911351=:59160--