From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Nov 2 18:15:40 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA14088 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 2 Nov 1996 18:15:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp (root@tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp [133.246.32.58]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA14074 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 1996 18:15:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp (masafumi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp (8.8.2/3.4W4-SMTP) with ESMTP id LAA06226; Sun, 3 Nov 1996 11:14:51 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199611030214.LAA06226@mail.tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, fenner@parc.xerox.com Cc: max@wide.ad.jp Subject: Re: Compressed or uncompressed man pages in PLIST? From: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= X-Mailer: Mew version 1.06 on Emacs 19.28.1, Mule 2.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 03 Nov 1996 11:14:51 +0900 Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Bill> Should I put the name of the compressed or the Bill> uncompressed man pages in the PLIST? If the man pages are to be compressed without NOMANCOMPRESS undefined, put compressed name into the packing list. Don't worry about the situation with NOMANCOMPRESS defined. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Masafumi NAKANE, Keio Univ., Dept. of Environmental Information E-Mail : max@wide.ad.jp / max@FreeBSD.ORG [URL] : http://www.sfc.wide.ad.jp/~max/