From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov 30 03:35:54 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779EA16A4CF
	for <openoffice@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 03:35:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-in.m-online.net (svr8.m-online.net [62.245.150.237])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3E743FEA
	for <openoffice@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 03:35:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from h@schmalzbauer.de)
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr14.m-online.net [192.168.3.144])
	by svr8.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485552084;
	Sun, 30 Nov 2003 12:35:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de
	(ppp-62-245-208-32.mnet-online.de [62.245.208.32])
	by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16BD1C0C5;
	Sun, 30 Nov 2003 12:35:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de>
To: Nakata Maho <chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 12:35:35 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <200311261438.03768@harrymail>
	<20031130.175915.783372313.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20031130.175915.783372313.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp>
X-Birthday: 06 Oktober 1972
X-Name: Harald Schmalzbauer
X-Phone1: +49 (0) 163 555 3237
X-Phone2: +49 (0) 89 18947781
X-Address: Munich, 80686
X-Country: Germany
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1;
  boundary="Boundary-02=_OYdy/vtrG8QQ7B/";
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200311301235.42303@harrymail>
cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Performance difference native/linux OOo1.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD <freebsd-openoffice.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>,
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>,
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 11:35:54 -0000


--Boundary-02=_OYdy/vtrG8QQ7B/
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 30 November 2003 09:59, Nakata Maho wrote:
> Hi, Harald
>
> > Hello dear OpenOffice port maintainers,
> >
> > I am wondering why there is such a big performance difference between t=
he
> > linux and the native OpenOffice version on FreeBSD 5.2-beta (i386).
> > For example starting the native OO takes about 30 seconds, where the
> > Linux version takes about 5 seconds.
> >
> > If some of you speak german please also have a look at:
> > http://www.bsdforen.de/forums/showthread.php?s=3D&threadid=3D2177
>
> Hmm I don't understand German...sad.
> Anyway it takes about 10 seconds for me to start OOo
> Pentium 4B, 2.4G...

Eh, we don't have that fast machines;)
The conclusion of the german thread is that there are lots of people=20
confirming that enormuous difference.
Don't know about their machines, I'm talking about 1,1Celeron,i815,256MB,IDE
But it doesn' matter how long it takes to start, the emu-port is MUCH faste=
r.=20
I heard that it's also true for operation, but I haven't tried.

Thanks,

=2DHarry

>
> --maho

--Boundary-02=_OYdy/vtrG8QQ7B/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQA/ydYNBylq0S4AzzwRAqtnAKCIcO4L03ghXnEHRjBpv8PkUinjkwCfSjJQ
BOigWEKP0kxsvvfxX1BlYkQ=
=mjnJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_OYdy/vtrG8QQ7B/--