From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 15 11: 8:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.nxe.de (mail.nxe.de [212.42.225.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA24137B502 for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 11:08:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.nxe.de (8.10.2/nora-20000620) for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (envelope-from nora) id e9FI8gE02829; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 20:08:42 +0200 (CEST) Apparently-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 20:08:42 +0200 From: Nora Etukudo To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: wondered, why I didn't had this problem too (was: Error: your port uses an old layout. Please update it to match this bsd.port.mk. - SOLVED) Message-ID: <20001015200842.A2149@mail.nxe.de> References: <8666mu5d5h.fsf@unicorn.ea4els.ampr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from brett@peloton.runet.edu on Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 12:51:34PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 12:51:34PM -0400, Brett Taylor wrote: > My guess is you use CVSup to get the ports. CVSup will not remove the old > pkg/ and patches/ directory when they are empty. The new format puts all Nice! :-) During the last few days I wondered, why I didn't had this problem too. Now, I know: I never fiddled with 'cvssup' or the like but always did a 'rsync' from 'FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/ports'. Sometimes it might have advantages not to go the recommended way. ;-) Liebe Grüße, Nora. -- nora@sappho-net.de http://www.sappho-net.de/ Lesbian Computer Networks, Finland http://www.sappho.net/ Web for Women (von Frauen, für Frauen) http://www.w4w.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message