From owner-freebsd-security Thu Jul 13 17: 5: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from srh0902.urh.uiuc.edu (srh0902.urh.uiuc.edu [130.126.76.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E060D37BA30 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 17:04:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ftobin@uiuc.edu) Received: (qmail 62455 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Jul 2000 00:04:57 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jul 2000 00:04:57 -0000 Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 19:04:42 -0500 (CDT) From: Frank Tobin X-Sender: ftobin@srh0902.urh.uiuc.edu To: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Two kinds of advisories? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kris Kennaway, at 13:44 -0700 on Thu, 13 Jul 2000, wrote: > "Ports" is already in the subject. If someone doesn't know what "Ports" > means, how will changing the advisory numbering make any difference? Because management won't know what "Ports" means, but will make decisions about the use of FreeBSD irregardless of whether the advisory is really for FreeBSD. - -- Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: pgpenvelope 2.8.9 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAjluWSgACgkQVv/RCiYMT6MjKACePjuptQtrnbs4kbOoMwjjYHlC ch0AoIhaO6ntmXcgrSmaTrrsvwe2Bx71 =I13e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message