From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Apr 23 22:47:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from unbeat.com (24-168-39-59.nyc.rr.com [24.168.39.59]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882C137B424 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:47:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from moxie@unbeat.com) Received: (from moxie@localhost) by unbeat.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f3O5lDt01007 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 01:47:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from moxie) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 01:47:13 -0400 From: JT To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pkg/port dependency tool (enclosed) Message-ID: <20010424014713.G350@zed.unbeat.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from Jeff+freebsd@wagsky.com on Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 08:35:16AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 08:35:16AM -0700, Jeff Kletsky wrote: > in a more targeted way if the appropriate lead would let me know. > > Jeff > > P.S. This type of dependency checking might also allow the "make > clean" process a bit smarter and faster (the other option there would be > to specify a flag that says not to follow dependencies on a recursive > "clean", especially in /usr/ports) This works (NOCLEANDEPENDS), but am I just an idiot for not finding out how to make the "package" target recurse through dependencies? Or is my knowledge of 'make' just so weak? Something smells funny to me, because there must be others who make complex packages and wish to distribute them... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message